<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two follow-ups to the protests in France&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancingwithwords.com/2006/04/12/two-follow-ups-to-the-protests-in-france/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancingwithwords.com/2006/04/12/two-follow-ups-to-the-protests-in-france/</link>
	<description>Living the dance, dancing the life.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared Goralnick</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingwithwords.com/2006/04/12/two-follow-ups-to-the-protests-in-france/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingwithwords.com/2006/04/12/two-follow-ups-to-the-protests-in-france/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>You know I hadn't really considered the meaning of that.  You're correct in its primary significance, according to a BBC glossary:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Iron Rice Bowl is a Chinese idiom referring to the system of guaranteed lifetime employment in state enterprises. Job security and level of wages were not related to job performance - but adherence to party doctrine played a very important role.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don't think that Kirk meant it to so pointedly to refer to communism.  I imagine he just felt that they expected to be spoonfed regardless of their level of job performance.  I don't think the communism allusion has to be applied, but I do see your point.

I guess I'm taking Kirk's side because I'm somewhat familiar with his writing--I just don't think that was the implication he was after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I hadn&#8217;t really considered the meaning of that.  You&#8217;re correct in its primary significance, according to a BBC glossary:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Iron Rice Bowl is a Chinese idiom referring to the system of guaranteed lifetime employment in state enterprises. Job security and level of wages were not related to job performance - but adherence to party doctrine played a very important role.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that Kirk meant it to so pointedly to refer to communism.  I imagine he just felt that they expected to be spoonfed regardless of their level of job performance.  I don&#8217;t think the communism allusion has to be applied, but I do see your point.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m taking Kirk&#8217;s side because I&#8217;m somewhat familiar with his writing&#8211;I just don&#8217;t think that was the implication he was after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate.d.</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingwithwords.com/2006/04/12/two-follow-ups-to-the-protests-in-france/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>kate.d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingwithwords.com/2006/04/12/two-follow-ups-to-the-protests-in-france/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>"an iron rice-bowl"? seriously??

if i'm gleaning the reference correctly here, this guy is setting up that dichotomy that really pisses me off: either worship at the altar of the free market and american 'entrepreneurial" spirit, or be a commie slave worker. and that's patently ridiculous.

but correct me if i'm wrong....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;an iron rice-bowl&#8221;? seriously??</p>
<p>if i&#8217;m gleaning the reference correctly here, this guy is setting up that dichotomy that really pisses me off: either worship at the altar of the free market and american &#8216;entrepreneurial&#8221; spirit, or be a commie slave worker. and that&#8217;s patently ridiculous.</p>
<p>but correct me if i&#8217;m wrong&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
